I generally like your work, and the punchline without the bonus panel works well (and I agree that seeing the rose guy again is a nice touch), but framing women as a commodity for men to purchase (E: in the bonus panel) is unnecessary misogynistic bullshit.
This could have been the same comic but with a woman
Except it isn’t. Because women buying men isn’t an overused trope in all media (not to mention reality), while men buying women is. Because of misogyny.
You not wanting to hear this because it’s easier for you to keep laughing at lazy sexist “humour” than it is to challenge your bias and make a miniscule effort to do better, doesn’t change its validity.
I generally like your work, and the punchline without the bonus panel works well (and I agree that seeing the rose guy again is a nice touch), but framing women as a commodity for men to purchase (E: in the bonus panel) is unnecessary misogynistic bullshit.
Who let Tumblr federate in here?
This could have been the same comic but with a woman. It wouldn’t change a thing, you’re interpreting things into it yourself.
Did you look at the bonus panel?
If the genders were swapped it would have been a Boyfriend store, there’s endless variations possible, next valentines I’ll expect a Furry store.
Except it isn’t. Because women buying men isn’t an overused trope in all media (not to mention reality), while men buying women is. Because of misogyny.
You not wanting to hear this because it’s easier for you to keep laughing at lazy sexist “humour” than it is to challenge your bias and make a miniscule effort to do better, doesn’t change its validity.
deleted by creator