AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoGoogle is charging its employees $99 a night to stay at its on-campus hotel to help "transition to the hybrid workplace."gizmodo.comexternal-linkmessage-square183fedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down116 cross-posted to: technews@radiation.party
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1external-linkGoogle is charging its employees $99 a night to stay at its on-campus hotel to help "transition to the hybrid workplace."gizmodo.comAllonzeeLV@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square183fedilink cross-posted to: technews@radiation.party
minus-squareTransplantedSconie@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up44arrow-down3·1 year agoBut then you can’t siphon off 99$ a night from them! Come on, everyone! We gotta get those profits up!
minus-squarepenguin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down2·1 year agoIt has nothing to do with profits. It’s more profitable to have everyone work from home. Upper managers and executives simply prefer having everyone in the office because they like it. It’s their preference.
minus-squarepenguin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·1 year agoIt’s not though. None of this back-to-office stuff is for real estate.
minus-squareDevdogg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoUhh, yes it is? I mean, if you take a look at how much real estate San Francisco has just in its downtown area that should tell you something.
But then you can’t siphon off 99$ a night from them!
Come on, everyone! We gotta get those profits up!
It has nothing to do with profits. It’s more profitable to have everyone work from home. Upper managers and executives simply prefer having everyone in the office because they like it. It’s their preference.
deleted by creator
It’s not though. None of this back-to-office stuff is for real estate.
Uhh, yes it is? I mean, if you take a look at how much real estate San Francisco has just in its downtown area that should tell you something.