• Kernel@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I don’t like neutering an artist’s vision in the name of conformity or commercial pressure, it’s generally a wise business practice to avoid deliberately offending your potential audience. I suppose a healthy gaming franchise needs new users to thrive, and maybe toning down the excess will broaden the game’s appeal.

    • megabucks@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That video you shared was great!

      I agree that neutering an artist’s vision is almost always a mistake, but I wonder if the artist’s vision has changed with the times as well? Furthermore, with patches, updates, downloadable content, and expansion packs for games, at what point is a game, as a work of art, complete?

      How do you even begin to preserve a work of art when it is constantly changing and evolving?

          • Senicar@social.cyb3r.dog
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            One character is explicitly underage and sexually assaulted in game. Another is the “she died young and is a ghost so she just LOOKS young but she’s actually way older” trope.

    • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is definitely important in this case. While Skullgirls definitely has a following, it’s a difficult game to turn on in a couch setting because to those unfamiliar with the game, the style could easily come off as predatory.