• norbert@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Having lived in a state that she didn’t visit, I’ve heard it mentioned more than once.

    Is it logical and rational? Not necessarily, but people do want to feel heard and writing off huge swaths of the country because you didn’t need those states to win, simply targeting specific, winnable states to get the required electors). Is incredibly poor form and turns out was probably a mistake.

    It exposed them for what they were and still are, out-of-touch, rich, milquetoast know-nothings looking down their noses at huge chunks of the population at best. At worst thinking because they’re born of a certain class they’re entitled to rule.

    That you don’t know what Presidential candidates visit your state during an election is on you, pay more attention.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      That you don’t know what Presidential candidates visit your state during an election is on you, pay more attention.

      What difference would it make to me? What more would I learn?

      Just as an example, imagine me, going my whole adult life thinking women deserve the right to determine what happens with their own bodies. What could, say, Trump possibly say in person to make me change my position on that? Would it be some amazing argument that I had never heard on TV or over the internet? How could that possibly move me on positions I hold, and therefore change my vote?

      Do you see how fucking crazy that sounds?