It feels like the amount of both, divisive posts and ghoulish comments is rising again.

One could argue that the world has a lot of divisive stuff going on and lemmy just talks about it. But the way people post about stuff seems more oot and hateful than it has been in the past.

Not saying it is that but if I wanted to bring the Fediverse down or at least keep my customers from going there, I would sow this stuff as much as I can.

I’m blocking ghouls left right and center atm but if I ever asked a friend to join lemmy, I’d hate to think of what they would see that I dont anymore.

Do we need stronger moderation?

  • Maybe ban politics from c/memes?
  • Become a little more stringent on “dont be a jerk” rules in communities?

One thing that really bothers me is the collapsing “discourse”. Trying to mend fences and keep the conversation between sides going ime leads to nothing but downvotes and shitstorm.

I feel like a little more interaction (instead of intervention, at first) of the moderators would do wonders there.

Thanks for reading this rant. Have a nice day.

  • blahsay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    You’re not imagining it. I’m pretty sure you can see regular work from propaganda teams on lemmy. I’d love to see the backed logs to confirm it.

    They tend to work in very hostile teams to brigade topics.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I‘m encountering it this exact moment in a piracy discussion where some very abusive people start arguing for IP and excuse the blatant manipulation by calling limited licenses „buying“ and „owning“.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        I followed the thread you’re talking about, you might be a bit overly sensitive to what constitutes a conversation on the internet. I don’t find the trolling any worse or better today vs. last week or last year.

        You might want to make an account over at beehaw, they like to stay pretty sheltered over there and have defederated from, well, pretty much everyone.

        • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Well, I‘m not a bit overly sensitive I just dont like to be manipulated and insulted. It frankly do not care how people treat their family and friends. Having a discussion without personal attacks is normal and everything else is normalized abuse.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            You mentioned them calling something buying and selling. Did they also insult and manipulate you?

            • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Not sure if this is a sincere question.

              Manipulative and degrading rhetoric is what I‘m talking about. Bad faith arguments, assuming that someone arguing in a certain way must be naive or stupid, etc.

              • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                The question is definitely meant to highlight that I think you may be exaggerating, but in that purpose it is sincere.

                  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    No. Sincere use of a rhetorical question to make a point. While also leaving the door open, via format, that you might actually be telling you the truth. I purposefully leave both those avenues open because I don’t try to control the direction a conversation will go.

                  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    What you’re talking about is banning people across many instances at once. Please don’t do that to me.

      • blahsay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s interesting right?

        I’m thinking the architecture of the fediverse makes it particularly vulnerable to these sorts of attacks.

        I’m pretty sure I’ve spotted bots circle jerking on some subjects also which makes me think there’s a few different sources.

        • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Very interesting indeed.

          I‘m starting to report, block and ban accounts from being viewed on my instance that use abusive language but from a systemic standpoint we should find a design solution to make this work.

          Reddit had karma for this reason among others. People needed to make helpful contributions to prove they are able to function in the group.

          For many reasons this is not implemented in the fediverse but a design solution would be good.

          • blahsay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            If I was designing an anti troll/bot system I’d implement a few things. Let’s call any bad actor on here a bot/troll or broll for ease.

            1. Reputation based posting isn’t a bad idea if carefully done
            2. When a broll is banned any users from the same ip are flagged a suspect and a subsequent ban causes delayed posting from that ip. If a VPN the instance host list has the same effect applied. Exceptions based on Reputation.
            3. You can check if text is ai/llm generated and an automated api check before posting and immediate ban if found.
            4. Checks on if a user posts inhumanly fast or is oddly active etc would be sensible.
            5. Any broll system has to be adaptive and measures taken need to be kept secret (this post for example).
            • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Very good ideas! Any idea if something like this already exists? If not, shall we work on something? I have some experience in python if that helps.

            • intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              You can check if text is ai/llm generated and an automated api check before posting and immediate ban if found

              If this LLM-detection function ever results in false positives, this system will be banning innocent people.

              Also there are many, many cases where a person openly displays results from an LLM, without it being in any way antisocial.

              • blahsay@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                The odds of someone coming up with the same sentence as an llm within common sense bounds of time far exceed winning the lottery or getting struck by lightning.

                Your second point is straight up nonsense. This platform is for humans to interact. The use of bots is inherently deceptive.

                Fascinating to have someone argue for them. I think the backend logs will be pretty illuminating.

                • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I don’t know what a person “coming up with the same sentence as an llm” would have anything to do with this unless the LLM detection is based on direct string comparison.

                  The use of bots is inherently deceptive

                  Nope. I can say:

                  Here’s what GPT-4 generated when I gave it that prompt: “[some LLM output that would get them banned by the machine we’re proposing to build]”

                  That is not deceptive. But it would be detected by this system and result in them being banned. Because you guys are gung-ho to build a powerful head-cracking machine and didn’t think of an obvious edge case.

                  • blahsay@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    You’re wrong and don’t have the technical knowledge to understand why and I can’t be asked explaining it.

                    Relax, it won’t affect that case.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Okay here. Since you want to mark me as a troll now, I’m just gonna stop being polite about how I do this. Because the polite way Om trying to do this is coming across to you as inauthentic, and the inauthenticity is coming across as trolling, and now you’re talking about applying this proposed mega ban hammer to me.

            I don’t believe that you’re capable of seeing this clearly, and I won’t believe it until I you have linked to at least ten comments, in other threads, that you think represent this particular type of toxicity you’re complaining about.

            • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Whatever you think mate. Feel free to imagine anything you like.

              If you have arguments, feel free to argue. If not, just go somewhere else.