• jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Even if true, I don’t see the Supreme Court making him ineligible without a conviction, and I don’t see them marking him an insurrectionist while the court case is still pending.

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Doesn’t require any of that. Read the 14th, his culpabillity is already an established fact (even at the lowest level, nobody disagrees that he is culpable and satisfies the criteria in 14th -> ineligible).