• ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        “Sorry your daughter and wife were raped and murdered right before your eyes. See we thought it was a prank call so we didn’t respond”

        You can replace that scenario with any other and it still fits.

    • hperrin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not if you’re the false positive that gets a grenade thrown in your baby’s crib.

      • maness300@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        And that’s worse than ignoring a real threat?

        “Sorry, we didn’t send help because we thought this was a prank.”

        Use your brains.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think it’s possible that might just maybe a middle ground between going equipped for the third world war and ignoring the call.

          To suggest otherwise is just accepting that the police are heavily militarized and I don’t think that sensible.

          Swatting is nowhere near as big a deal in other countries so clearly it’s a solvable problem.

          • maness300@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Swatting is nowhere near as big a deal in other countries so clearly it’s a solvable problem.

            Why isn’t as big a deal in other countries, though? Time to put on our critical thinking caps!

            Is it because they have more measures in place to identify false threats? Does this also coincide with LE ignoring real threats?

            Is it because their population doesn’t see the value in swatting as much as other nations’? (i.e. do they have fewer incels?)

            Is it something else?

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              It’s because the police don’t carry around assault rifles as a matter of course that’s why.

              If there is a hostage taker you want to negotiator not an attack force. If a negotiator goes to the property and it’s a false flag no issue.

              Sending in an armed force is literally the worst response in both real and false situations.

              • maness300@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                If there is a hostage taker you want to negotiator not an attack force. If a negotiator goes to the property and it’s a false flag no issue.

                You clearly don’t know the history behind why the SWAT teams were created. Educate yourself and then come back to us.