• DpwnShift@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not quite sure what your point is, but they aren’t “two different markets”.

    Sure, one is a (mostly) subscription model, but at the end of the day, they’re both digital Elder Scrolls games sold by the same publisher.

    • Blakerboy777@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the Venn diagram of people who will pay for ESO and people who will pay for ES6, I’m sure there’s a ton of overlap, but there’s probably some ESO players that aren’t necessarily huge fans of single player games, and I know for a fact a huge portion of people who played ES5 and will play ES6 will never play ESO. They are not the exact same group of consumers.

    • jinno@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Prior to ESO, though, Elder Scrolls was a franchise entirely marketed at people who wanted single player RPG experiences.

      Even if it’s still Elder Scrolls content- a good portion of that original market is not going to have interest in a multiplayer experience. Or a subscription experience. Or a”live narrative” experience with gated content windows.

      It’s a very different experience at its core, so while there may be an overlap between the two markets in the Venn Diagram, it’s still a very different market segment than a pure single player outing.

    • JickleMithers@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They may both be Elder Scrolls games but I have 0 interest in ESO. I’m not an MMO player and never will be. It is a different market. You can have two things set in the same world that have different markets imo.