https://zeta.one/viral-math/

I wrote a (very long) blog post about those viral math problems and am looking for feedback, especially from people who are not convinced that the problem is ambiguous.

It’s about a 30min read so thank you in advance if you really take the time to read it, but I think it’s worth it if you joined such discussions in the past, but I’m probably biased because I wrote it :)

  • wischi@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Your example with the absolute values is actually linked in the “Even more ambiguous math notations” section.

    Geogebra has indeed found a good solution but it only works if you input field supports fractions and a lot of calculators (even CAS like WolframAlpha) don’t support that.

    • 🐠 tiago🍍@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah! That’s why I mentioned it, it was a fresh ambiguous notation problem that I’ve never encountered before. Discussions of “is it 1 or 9” get tiring quickly.

      At least WA and others tell you how they interpret the input, instead of being a black box (until you get to the manuals). Even though it is obvious in hindsight, I didn’t get why two calculators would yield different results; thanks!

      Nice write-up.

    • Even more ambiguous math notations

      Except that isn’t ambiguous either. See my reply to the original comment.

      Geogebra has indeed found a good solution

      Geogebra has done the same thing as Desmos, which is wrong. Desmos USED TO give correct answers, but then they changed it to automatically interpret / as a fraction, which is good, except when they did that it ALSO now interprets ÷ as a fraction, which is wrong. ½ is 1 term, 1÷2 is 2 terms (but Desmos now treats it as 1 term, which goes against the definition of terms)