• thoro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The point being that your place of residence, the place where you possibly stake your roots and raise your family, is not fully yours and can just as easily be taken away if you suffer any type of financial misfortune or fail to keep up financially with the market around your community.

    The relationship to your lender is very similar to a renter’s relationship to their landlord.

    Equity is a benefit, surely, but indebting yourself for 30 years in a location you may have compromised for is the other side of it. And your relationship to a higher authority who truly owns your property remains (until the debt is paid, of course).

    Inherently, it all comes back to private property and one’s relationship with its owners.

    • sgtgig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The relationship to your lender is very similar to a renter’s relationship to their landlord

      Is it though? Landlords typically have hot opinions on what you do with the property. Banks don’t care so long as you don’t literally destroy it. When I rented I felt stifled in things like modifying my place, adopting a dog, painting walls, etc. Owning my place feels a lot better even if it costs a lot more.

      I get what you say kind of from a financial sense but even then it’s radically different. You can pay extra every month to get a mortgage finished early. Each year you get more and more equity and are in a better financial spot. When a lease renews your landlord has the option to say “I want more money, so you have to pay extra now” or just straight up refuse to let you live there anymore, and at the end you have nothing. And a foreclosure is a much lengthier process with more outs for a homeowner than an eviction is for a renter.