• MeanEYE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Long lasting content means fuck all if it’s boring content. Not to mention you need gazillion loading screens which prolongs “play time”.

    • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure. But that’s a different topic.

      Quantitatively, Starfield simply has more hand-crafted content than Skyrim. More and bigger cities/settlements, hand-crafted dungeons, and handcrafted quests. In the map-size cases, it’s only slightly more, but in terms of quests, Starfield has about as many hand-crafted quests as Skyrim and Fallout 4 combined.

      Now, if you don’t enjoy exploring in Starfield, you won’t find a lot of those quests (same as Skyrim). Heck, if you don’t enjoy the quests themselves at all, that’s a thing too. There’s a neat hand-crafted quest around every corner… if you’re not so bored you just rush the main story. I for one really liked the Neon Street Gang quests and (haven’t finished it yet) the Crucible quest chain. Both of them I completely missed in my first playthrough because the game didn’t hold my hand to find them.

    • coffinwood@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How does a loading screen “prolong” playtime when the alternative is going or flying everywhere in real time?

      Game is short. People complain. Game is long. People complain. Game makes you stare at five hour space travel. People complain. Game gives you fast travel. People complain. Game takes you by the hand. People complain. Game forces exploration. People complain.

      I’m tired.