• Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reminder that it was Reagan who took guns away in California because he didnt want Black Panthers having guns.

    • BassaForte@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am 100% aware, thank you. But that doesn’t change the fact that dems have to spout garbage about gun bans every time they open their mouths.

      • vivadanang@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Red flag laws to prevent nutbags from owning assault rifles isn’t ‘a gun ban’. No one’s treading on you sweetie. No one step on snek.

        You just feel so persecuted someone might DARE to regulate your fetish it gets you all worked up.

        • BassaForte@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So many assumptions in one comment, lmao. You don’t know me, but nice attempt at insulting me.

          But FWIW, “assault weapons ban” is literally a “ban” and they’ve been pushing it for years. I’m not talking about red flag laws.

          EDIT: Okay I’m seriously confused why so many of you outright deny that dems are constantly talking about gun bans. Do you watch the news, like at all? No matter the source, and AT LEAST every election cycle, there’s a constant stream of pushing for an assault weapons ban. You have to be actually living under a rock to have never seen those words written or spoken by a dem.

          And FWIW, THIS IS COMING FROM A DEM. I am against gun bans, but why the fuck are you lying and denying that dems don’t talk about gun bans??? Are you trying to play stupid?

          • vivadanang@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can see that you’re seriously confused. You even think you’re a dem.

            Wow.

            • BassaForte@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not a dem because the only issue I disagree with Dems on is guns? Despite the fact that I vote dem? Ok buddy

              You know, you can vote a certain way but still disagree with and be vocal about certain issues.

            • yeather@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              (38)The term “semi-automatic” means A: Upon firing, uses a portion of the energy to eject the last round and load another. B: Requires a seperste pull of the trigger C: Is not a machine-gun

              (V)(1) Except those provided exemptions, it is illegal to import, sell, manufacture, transfer, recieve, or possess a firearm of the above description, or any combination of parts that can create the above description.

              (2)(1) Exemptions include:

              • Sale to government agency or any State or Tribe.
              • Sale to nuclear power plant security forces.
              • Any grandfathered in device, all semi-automatics are grandfathered if manufactured and purchased before the date of enactment.
              • Any immediate family transfers are still allowed for grandfathered devices.
              • 22.cal Firearms.
              • Fixed magazines under 10 rounds (rifles)
              • Fixed magazines under 15 rounds (pistols)

              (W)(1) It is now illegal to import, sell, manufacture, transfer, or possess high capacity feeding decices over 10 rounds. Same exemptions apply minus the last.

              Breaking of this law constitutes a maximum. 10 year prison sentence and $250000

            • BassaForte@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago
              1. So you’re okay with the government seizing your property and most likely not giving you the cash value of your rifles (because if you think they will, that’s hilarious)

              2. People need long guns for as long as conservatives are going to attempt insurrections and threaten civil war. But no let’s just ignore everything that happened in 2020.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I need to make a c/AsAGunOwner you’re a gun owner like I’m the king of England.

              You even saying the word assault rifle is hilarious…you cannot just buy an assault rifle, they are just dressed up plastic semi-automatic rifles…and you’d know that if you were an actual gun owner.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nobody who has been on Reddit or Lemmy for any amount of time needs a reminder about that because it gets repeated 1 million times per day on every platform whenever gun control is mentioned.