• roastpotatothief@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    208
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It is useful to have lots of stupid laws. It makes people feel powerless and frustrated. It means the police can always find excuses to persecute you.

    The technicalities of the individual laws are not important. It’s the psychological effect of the whole body of laws on a people.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Rainwater collection laws in the US are based on conservation and fair allocation of a scarce resource.

        In places that don’t have scarcity, you actually have the opposite issue, where drainage might be restricted or mandated to prevent issues from harming your neighbors.

        I can’t build a dam on my property because it might flood my neighbor. People in the southwest can’t collect water at will because it might dry out their neighbors.

      • kool_newt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This isn’t as bad as it sounds. Water prevented from reaching the ground in watersheds means groundwater doesn’t get replenished. Now maybe a house here and there collecting rainwater isn’t a problem, but what about Nestle? The law should allow reasonable rainwater collection by individuals or family households while preventing theft of water from a region.

        • uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          means groundwater doesn’t get replenished.

          To then be extracted by greedy corporation.

    • You999@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is useful to have lots of stupid laws. It makes people feel powerless and frustrated. It means the police can always find excuses to persecute you.

      How many laws does the US have again?