• Mio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone once said to me. Microsoft is not something you like, but is something you have to withstand due to Enterprise use it so much, and have so many users.

    But when it comes to the browser, then you have to follow the standard for HTML, and suddenly you can choose something else.

    • Kogasa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      “have to follow the standard for HTML”

      Websites have historically been so godawful about complying with web standards that browsers had no choice but to support grossly non-standard code. Which then became standard. Now the vast majority of the web only works because of browser implementation details. So it’s Chromium and Gecko and nothing else ever again.

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Microsoft is actually to blame for that. IE6 was bundled with XP and was so popular that others have been in single digit percentages. MS used this to start modifying standards and developers followed most popular browser. The ever so famous embrace, extend, extinguish tactics MS is so fond of. So JS and CSS being broken for the longest time was thanks to MS and their attempt to secure monopoly, which they succeeded for the better part of the decade.

          • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Indeed. Although Google has less power than what Microsoft did. Chrome’s engine is after all open source and everyone can just diverge. However there are more things than just engine. All Google needs to do is require Chrome to be able to sync bookmarks or something similar and people will ditch others.