Todd Howard: “You may need to upgrade your PC for this game”

  • lichtmetzger@feddit.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, it’s an area in Atlantis that you visit as part of the romance questline with Sarah. Bethesda hasn’t changed a lot in the water system since Skyrim and I believe it’s laughable in 2023 for a game that costs 99$.

    • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      So you’re saying its an area that isn’t meant to be normally seen. Some players may see it once in a play through, and only if they romance Sarah. That’s the exact definition of not normally seen.

      • lichtmetzger@feddit.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s the exact definition of not normally seen.

        No it’s not. You visit this area during a mission and you can visit it every time you land on Atlantis, which is the main hub city of the game.

        Added to that, the whole point of Sarah bringing you here is to look at how beautiful this place is, which is ridiculous when you look at it. :D

        • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          A completely optional mission, in a completely optional romance line, that you only see once should you choose that one romance quest out of the options. Normally seen in a game is something like the New Atlantis Spaceport, which every player sees multiple times in a playthrough.

          Though I do agree, I did that romance, and was certainly underwhelmed by the waterfall.

          • schmidtster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Are you seriously excusing shit waterfall mechanics/graphics game wide because this one particular view is only forced on you once in a certain situation?

            That’s a new take lmfao.

            • lichtmetzger@feddit.deOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Some people are really pissed because I posted a shitty meme, it really is ridiculous. But I guess when you spend up to a hundred bucks on a 6/10 RPG that was hyped-up like crazy you need to vent all of this frustration somewhere…

              • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The memes not shitty, people just ignore stuff for whatever justifications they can come up. If you can view it once, why should it be a different quality than something you see 100x? It’s a bloody water effect, there should be zero difference.

                Change the what item it is and it shouldn’t change anything either.

              • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Don’t put words in my mouth. And I spent $0 on it, gamepass for the win. I still enjoy the game, even with it’s shitty waterfall.

                • lichtmetzger@feddit.deOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I still enjoy the game, even with it’s shitty waterfall.

                  Just want to say, that I did so, too! It’s not a bad game at all, but it could’ve been better in so many ways. Writing, game mechanics, world building…

            • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, I’m just correcting the poster who says it’s a normally viewed part of the game. Are you unable to read or understand simple context?

                • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  My comment says I agree the waterfall is shitty, did you miss that part?

                  And no, I’m not incorrect, when a person asks if it is a normally viewed part of the game, that means viewed commonly by everyone. The waterfall is not a normally viewed part of the game.

                  It is shitty, and it shouldn’t be, but it is not normally viewed by most players.

                  • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    There is no part of any game that is “viewed by everyone” unless it’s a scripted part of the game.

                    There’s some doors in skyrim I never entered. So by your weird logic, that interior in whiterun wouldn’t be a normally viewed part of the game.

                    Do you understand how asinine of a viewpoint that is now? Not normally viewable would be boundary breaking or a weird location you would only enter to look for loot or something.

          • Umbrias@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is not a great argument unless you are very deep into pretending a game company can do no wrong.

            There are lots of ways this is silly to claim is fine, it’s ridiculous to act like this is expected or acceptable and not just amateurish lack of polish.

            But it’s okay, you can still enjoy the game. It’s okay to enjoy things which have flaws.

            • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Did I say it was acceptable? No, I said it was underwhelming.

              What I’m arguing is it is not a normally viewed part of the game, because the vast majority of players will never see it.