Industrially processed pizzas, cereals, and convenience foods are responsible for a host of diseases. Policymakers and doctors need to lead the food fight.

  • Mateng@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the article:

    People who live with diet-related diseases, especially obesity, usually have a strong feeling of guilt, thinking they are the problem due to their own lack of willpower. Researchers now know this isn’t true. This food has been engineered to be addictive. We need to shift the blame away from the population.

    Just a detail, but yes! Legislators, please help our society to not suffer under the downsides of capitalism.

  • yesdogishere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    we need population control. a good way is to let people enjoy life fast, work harder, and pass away earlier. hence, processed food, stressful lives, high mortgages etc etc all create a good and compliant workforce. the billionaires need u guys to work for them.

  • Catch42@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I work in this space (food processing) and deal with this negative public perception all the time. I really think it’s misplaced. The degree to which something is processed is not a good indicator of it’s healthfulness. Tomato paste is a highly processed food, those tomatoes go through the ringer to end up in a little can you can use year round. Those little packs of peeled and sliced apples they sell to put in lunch boxes are a incredibly “processed”; in order to keep them fresh the entire composition of the atmosphere inside those little bags has to be modified, and the bag itself has to be semi-permeable so it can deal with the ethylene gas that the apple slices release.

    All that to say that processing makes ultra-unhealthy foods possible, but I don’t think it’s a good metric that we should base policy off of. If we want to regulate the area it should be of the nutritional value of the products. Of course that’s harder to legislate because people get mad when you try to restrict what they can eat, unlike restricting processing which most people don’t know anything about.

    • fuzzzerd@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Couldn’t agree more. The processing is a distraction. Good food can be heavily processed and bad food can lightly processed. The issue is that the processing of food makes some foods easier for overconsumption. That’s not an issue than can be legislated at the root cause and anything else will have unintended side effects.

  • exohuman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the problem is deeper than what food is available. It’s in what time is available. We have to work so many hours to be able to afford to live. At the end of the day I am tired. My spouse is tired. We end up choosing something we can make quickly that’s affordable. Oftentimes, that’s something with processed ingredients, because we aren’t eating a salad every meal. You want a healthier population? Give them time to cook without losing all their free time.

    • DarkGamer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      @sinnerman That article is much better, thanks for sharing it! I’d never thought of ultraprocessing as predigestion before.

      For a time, Kevin Hall, a nutrition and metabolism scientist at the National Institutes of Health, was also skeptical that ultra-processed foods were harmful.

      To test the idea, he designed a study that compared what happened when men and women were recruited to live in a lab and fed different diets. In one phase of the study, the participants ate mostly ultra-processed foods for two weeks. Their daily meals consisted of things like honey nut oat cereal, flavored yogurt, blueberry muffins, canned ravioli, steak strips, mashed potatoes from a packet, baked potato chips, goldfish crackers, diet lemonade and low-fat chocolate milk.

      In a second phase of the study, the participants were fed a diet of mostly homemade, unprocessed foods for two weeks that was matched for nutrients like salt, sugar, fat, and fiber. Their meals consisted of foods such as Greek yogurt with walnuts and fruit, spinach salad with grilled chicken, apple slices, bulgur and fresh vinaigrette, and beef tender roast with rice pilaf, steamed vegetables, balsamic vinaigrette, pecans and orange slices.

      In both cases, the participants were allowed to eat as much or as little of the foods and snacks as they wanted.

      “If it was really about the nutrients — and not about the processing — then there shouldn’t be any major difference in calorie intake between these two diets,” said Hall. “I thought that was going to be the result of the study.”

      But, he added, “I was hugely wrong.”

      When people ate the ultra-processed diet, they consumed substantially more calories — about 500 more calories a day compared to when they ate the mostly unprocessed diet. The result: They gained weight and body fat.

      The researchers also noticed a difference in how quickly the participants consumed their food. They ate the ultra-processed meals significantly faster, at a rate of about 50 calories per minute, compared to just 30 calories per minute on the unprocessed diet.

      Fascinating.

      • HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I say this in jest: but as someone who has run the gamut between elaborate home cooking and “fuck it, it’s frozen pizza night” I can’t help but laugh that people who eat unprocessed meals eat more slowly. I’ve often realized I can’t scarf down my delicious home cooked meal in 10 minutes since it took me 90+ minutes to make it! Just wouldn’t be right!

      • cooljacob204@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        To say that this makes processed foods bad for you however is kinda ridiculous imo. Might as well tell people to only eat raw things because it has the least calories / most filling.

        Bad food is bad for you, eating junk food is known to be a giant waste of calories and how it’s prepared doesn’t make it better or worse.

        Outside of increased calories I have not seen any evidence that food being more “processed” is actually bad for you.

        I’m not sure when this movement against junk food became a movement against processed foods but it’s moving in the wrong direction. Plenty of shitty junk foods can have very little processing involved. And I’m convinced it’s exactly those “low processed” junk food providers that are pushing all this bullshit.

          • cooljacob204@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hall recruited 20 healthy adult volunteers to stay at an NIH facility for a four-week period

            Wake me up when an actual legit study shows it. And yes obesity is bad and does all the negative things you put in your comment. So does eating too much red meat or consuming too much sodium or… so on and so forth.

            • RandoMcGuvins@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The 2nd article goes into more details

              “Ultra-processing degrades the internal structure or “food matrix,” the complex internal structure that not only holds the corn together, but influences the bio-availability of the nutrients, how our bodies use the food and whether we feel full after eating it.”

              “But the process also appears to accelerate the speed at which our digestive tracts absorb glucose and other nutrients from food, causing greater spikes in blood sugar and insulin levels, studies show.”

              ““Extrusion cooking at very drastic pressures and temperatures is a kind of predigestion of your food,” said Anthony Fardet, a nutrition scientist at the French National Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment who studies the effects of food processing on health.”
              Source

              I also agree that a study of 20 adults is absurd.

        • Maeve@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I bought a bunch of expensive microwave meals on sale (6 or so that were originally $6 each, but bogo’d, so $3 each) for times I have to drop what I’m doing and be busy or gone for an extended period. Nice ones like beef and broccoli, mashed potatoes and Salisbury steak, umami bowls. Imagine my chagrin when they ranged from 350-600 calories each, and nutrients were so minimal, they didn’t list a percentage of rda, but added sugar, sodium content and carb count were of the chart and besides for fat content, were the only things memorably listed.

        • RickRussell_CA@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          With respect, I think you’re ignoring the facts. How it’s prepared absolutely makes a difference in how it tastes, how easy it is to eat, etc. and there is a resulting effect on how much people eat.

          Freshly grilled chicken and frozen chicken patties are both chicken. But the chicken patty is ground, pre-seasoned, pre-cooked, etc. This makes it easier to get ready and easier to eat than a fresh chicken breast.

          The poison is in the dose, as they say. 500 calorie surplus every day is a pound a week of weight gain.

          And as dieticians have shown us over and over again, you can eat shitty food and be healthy, you just have to eat an appropriate amount of it. There are diets based on cookies and snack cakes, if you eat at your maintenance and cover a few basics with supplements, you can easily thrive on them.

      • fuzzzerd@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        What about riced cauliflower? The issue is the type of processing, but I’d submit that is a distractio to the bigger issue. The problem is that the processing often results in foods that are easier and tastier to eat, resulting in over consumption.

        • HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m also wondering if portioning isn’t also at play here with ultra processed foods.

          For a snack, I might eat a bag of baked potato chips (pulling this from the above quoted article) or apple slices. I think for many people, it’s natural to eat the whole portion in front of you, even past the feeling of satiated (not to be confused with the feeling of being full). Like, I don’t know many people who throw away a bag of chips with just 2 chips left in it. So even if the flavoring of the chips is no longer even appealing to me (I got just enough saltiness fix), I’m likely to finish the bag because it seems weird to “waste” those last 2 chips. And now, I’ve consumed an extra 15+ calories that I didn’t even enjoy. Compare to an apple for which, even if I’m kind of sick of it but still feel compelled to eat the whole thing, may be an extra +2 calories.

          Multiply over multiple snacks per week.

      • Silverseren@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        They use another vague term with little to no meaningful distinction in order to avoid the actual problem, which in this case is overeating and, in general, is foods having too much sugar, salt, and others things added. Additives that are fine in moderation, but are way higher and outside the daily recommended value in these cases.