• mondoman712@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    None of the places outside North America mentioned in the video have completely banned cars. The video is mostly talking about reducing car dependence and increasing options for transport rather than banning them completely.

    Also every situation you mentioned can be solved with a taxi or rental car. We can still do those things without having to drive everywhere for everything.

    • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but all taxis look the same, most have a monopoly or at best an oligopoly in major cities. Doesn’t that “rob us of our individualism?” and ability to break free of massive corporations/governments?

      Why rely on yet another corporation for a car when I can just use my own at any time on a whim?

      • mondoman712@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Again, the point is more about car dependence. Why be forced into driving everywhere when you could have other options available?

        • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          The solution to car dependence is to depend on another corporation gate keeping the cars?

          Help me unsee the irony here

          • mondoman712@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            1 year ago

            The solution is in the video… It’s walkable, cycle-able cities with good public transport.

            • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              Right, leave it to our very efficient and trustworthy governments to create non restrictive 15 min cities that everyone will enjoy lol. What could go wrong?

                • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’ll relieve you of this debate so you can return to your regularly scheduled echo chamber time. Sorry to disturb.

                  • mondoman712@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’d be happy to continue to discuss this with you, but please keep your fossil fuel funded conspiracy nonsense out of it.

      • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Gas companies are the biggest oligopoly. How can you “break free” from those corporations when you depend on a car to basic subsistence?

        • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah agreed, I’m all for getting rid of them too. Restricting peoples movement isn’t the answer though

              • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                1 year ago

                I never said roads, I said car centric infrastructure. You can have roads without being car centric. And elaborating on that, car centric infrastructure restrict the movement on everyone who don’t drive, for example poor people who can’t afford a car, gas, insurance… or younger people who can’t drive yet, or older and people with disabilities that can’t safely drive.

                • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  How does it impede on those who can’t drive? Because they’re not allowed to move as freely as someone with a car? How would taking away everyone’s car help that scenario?

                  • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    have you ever been to an American city? everything is at the service of roads, cars, and space to park the cars. we have thoroughfares through residential neighborhoods, monstrous intersections that are unsafe to cross by foot, infrastructure that’s unsafe to use by any mode of transportation that isn’t a car – because the cars will run you over – and it’s all wildly more expensive and less efficient than a functioning public transportation system. think of it like this – if more people can get where they need to go by public transit, the roads won’t be so congested.

                  • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Car centric infrastructure makes everything apart, so you can’t walk anywhere, public transit is unfeasible because the low density, and biking is extremely dangerous. They are not only not allowed to move “as freely”, they cannot movebat all. I don’t know where you get this “taking everyone’s car”, you’re the only one talking about it. You can can have infrastructure that is inclusive to everyone, even people with cars.