I just started using this myself, seems pretty great so far!

Clearly doesn’t stop all AI crawlers, but a significantly large chunk of them.

  • lime!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    the functional difference is that this does it once. you could just as well accuse git of being a major contributor to global warming.

    hash algorithms are useful. running billions of them to make monopoly money is not.

      • lime!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        the hashing part? it’s the same algo as here.

        • That’s not proof of work, though.

          git is performing hashes to generate identifiers for versions of files so it can tell when they changed. It’s like moving rocks to build a house.

          Proof of work is moving rocks from one pile to another and back again, for the only purpose of taking up your time all day.

          • lime!
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            39 minutes ago

            okay, git using the same algorithm may have been a bad example. let’s go with video games then. the energy usage for the fraction of a second it takes for the anubis challenge-response dance to complete, even on phones, is literally nothing compared to playing minecraft for a minute.

            if you’re mining, you do billions of cycles of sha256 calculations a second for hours every day. anubis does maybe 1000, once, if you’re unlucky. the method of “verification” is the wrong thing to be upset at, especially since it can be changed