• ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s faster, cheaper, and on the tech side more reliable (definitely not politically reliable though).

      • learningduck@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        My guess is better coverage and latency with its sheer number of satellites.

        They use low earth orbit, which require them to use more satellites, but lowered latency.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Technically, and this is purely semantics, coverage is the major downside to starlink. They are faster, though.

          The coverage of satellites has an exponential factor of the distance of that satellite to earth. If you had the satellite further out then its signal could reach a wider area before being cut off by the curvature of the earth. However, as the distance increases, so does latency.

      • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Now, I don’t know, but I would assume its the latency. Starlink has a (impressively) low ping of < 100ms, while existing alternatives usually have 600ms+. Now, that’s only relevant if they are using it for stuff like flying drones.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If America was a real country this guy would’ve immediately been removed from any and all companies he runs.

    Does SpaceX not have a board?

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    TBH I think any more low orbit telecom satellite arrays than we already have are just going to become a huge problem in the following decades.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      This has been commented before.

      Starlink flies at a very low altitude, meaning relatively high atmospheric drag, and a very short period of time before their sats deorbit if they go dead, less than ten years.

      It’s nowhere near the problem everyone makes it out to be.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        Official statemens claim they run for about 5 years, deorbit anywhere, and do NOT always burn up in reentry.

  • xye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Ah, the full Hitler, a bold move let’s see how it plays out.

  • rraggl@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That would be Eutelsat, but it is smaller in scale (at the moment) and therefore more expensive. It’s also said to be less userfriendly, but that should be possible to fix.

  • halfapage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “My starlink system”. He’s literally a walking, talking “you made this? I made this” meme.

    • phampyk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      Except for the fact that he doesn’t make anything, he pays people who do, then takes the credit for it. Is his way with everything: companies, gaming profiles…

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      I get what you’re saying, but I refer to my car as…my car. I didn’t turn a wrench in its construction, nor did I design it, but it’s still mine.

      • Betty_Boopie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        “I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army.”

        It’s the first sentence of the quoted tweet.

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        The interior, initial Musk tweet. It’s a snippet in the middle of a sentence.

  • vesi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I can’t stand the fact that Poland is doing Literally What they wanted - spending a lot of money on defence. Yet, they bark at them.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 hours ago

      nothing will ever be good enough for the fascist. the point is not deals, the point is capitulation. there are winners and losers to the fascist. there is no mutual aid or benefit

      • vesi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Thou are right! Someone once said that

        The US does not have allies. The US has only countries that are useful for a while.

        • syreus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Henry Kissinger

          To be fair he said a lot of things including:

          It is not a matter of what is true that counts, but a matter of what is perceived to be true.

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            That quote just reminded me of a Bertrand Russell quote:

            War does not determine who is right - only who is left

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Hey, rest of the Democratic world, there are a whole bunch of ex feds right now needing funds and direction for their anger. Maybe you should tap into them if you need someone to rid you of this meddlesome Chancellor.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    138
    ·
    8 hours ago

    He also challenged Zuck to a cage match and chickened out when Zuck accepted. They’re both pieces of shit.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      He even chickened out of his recent offer to come on the Daily Show and debate Job Stewart! He’s a Nazi coward even when it’s just talking…

    • Benjaben@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Lol I forgot about that! Yeah fuck em both of course, but I feel like most folks would put their money on the ex-KGB agent who seized and kept control of freakin’ Russia over nepo-baby “gamer”, “engineer” Musk. What a goofy threat. And I say that as a middling gamer and engineer myself lol

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I hate Zuck but in this match I’m thinking if it’s not mutually assured destruction, then I might root for Zuck. Elon is becoming a very big problem.