• febra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s called the 24/7 news cycle. They need to keep pumping out trash like this otherwise they might not improve their profit margins.

    • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Maybe we shouldn’t inform the population about this… And any other of Trump’s plans since they’re so obviously bad they don’t need explanation?

      Simply irresponsible to not do so, especially after an election where so much of the population were convinced Trump would be better for the economy. If anything we should be working harder to inform people, not looking for reasons to avoid these topics. What if someone saw that RFK would be doing this and saw no counter to his misinformation? Because it’s below someone to even discuss?

      It’s a duty to inform people, and I’m glad poynter is taking the initiative.

      • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        To support this counterpoint, this is exactly the headline my moron coworker would click and MAYBE get corrected in his stance on fluoridated water

        • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Thank you. The number of up votes the comments get saying that we shouldn’t even bother discussing this are staggering.

          • hyperreal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah that’s crazy to me. Of course it’s sad that we are at this point but to suggest that the article shouldn’t be written is just silly. What’s the alternative? Just isolate ourselves in our little echo chambers? People aren’t as intelligent as we’d like to believe. Moreover, confirmation bias and selective reasoning are strong behavioral forces. There has to be some middle ground between grossly unprofessional profit seeking and state run media.

            • futatorius@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Pretending there are two sides to arguments like this is a cause of brain rot. The middle ground between truth and a lie is a lie.

              • hyperreal@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                33 minutes ago

                Sheesh. How would the uniformed learn anything in your version of the world? People aren’t born with perfect omniscience. Skepticism and uncertainty exist, plain and simple. Fill in information asymmetries with quality information. That’s all that can be done.

            • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              Yea I mean, Poynter is a non-profit fact checking and journalism institute… They launched IFCN. Square all those accusations you’re seeing around here for me :)

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    You think this is stupid?

    RFK Jr. also thinks cell phones and 5G cause cancer. So get ready for an America with slow cell data and phones you’re not allowed to put up to your ear.

    I heard him tell a bullshit story about how he has hundreds of clients with grapefruit-sized tumors behind their ears from using cell phones. You know how you see all those people walking around with giant tumors behind their ears? Me neither.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The anti-5G propaganda was funded by manufacturers who weren’t ready to upgrade, to buy some time.

      RFK Jr is a con artist.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      So get ready for an America with slow cell data and phones you’re not allowed to put up to your ear.

      Hello EDGE, my old friend…

    • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      To be fair, people with tumors behind their ears will likely hide it to avoid assholes staring/taking pictures. I don’t see many cancer patients attending chemotherapy either because they are wearing hats/wigs.

      Still, shouldn’t they get cancer on their hands instead? That’s the closest body part to your phone at any time on average, isn’t it?

    • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      But don’t report on those things, because it’s irresponsible to do that. It’s simply to fill the 24/7 news cycle, not to inform anyone (despite this being a fact checking institute). /s

      What is going on in this sub?

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    You can’t give a platform or a stage to these people. You’re disrespecting your own journalism when you do.

  • littlewonder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Every time I see a question in a news headline, I just answer it with “no.” in my head and move on. 90% of the time it’s the same answer the article arrives at and the other 10% of the time, I’ll see a real headline about it from other sources anyway–with the actual lede in the title.

    • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It might be beneficial for some to understand the “what” and “why” behind the “no,” no?

      • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sure, but why not just lead with a negative assertion instead of implying that there’s an open question? The question implies that there is controversy, even when none exists.

        Fact Checking RFK Jr’s False Claims About Fluoride

        Would be a perfectly acceptable headline.

        • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          The title poses the claim in question from a neutral standpoint, and presents it’s fact checking case in the article. I don’t agree with the idea that a controversy is implied simply by doing that, or that there is an open question implied either. That is not apparent to me whatsoever, and I think this is a personal opinion rather than anything concrete. By reading the article, that is confirmed, and the reader also gains a lot of additional information on the matter.

  • infectoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not American but I feel like at this point I’d get a four year supply of popcorn and try to encourage the dumbest shit I’ve ever seen.

    Eg. Hulk Hogan should be head of the EPA. Start a campaign and mock outrage when trump is silent on the matter.

    • ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’d start asking for a ban in vaccines and to make tinfoil hats mandatory to protect your brain from the microwaves of he deep state that want to control your mind.