• whileloop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    155
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the world is going towards simplified logos, gotta at least make yours good. Firefox did that. Can’t complain.

    • tahoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I feel like it’s one of the best current logos. It’s simplified but not oversimplified and it looks really good.

    • original_ish_name@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      66
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not it. Mozilla has ruined firefox. They have added spyware and made google the default engine. Most of their profits go to shady places, etc

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        They have added spyware

        Uh, yeah; gonna need a source on this. You’re allowed to not like that they made Google the default search engine, but this statement is straight up-misinformation.

          • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            Takes a couple of seconds to change the default engine, turn off the gnarlier of the telemetry, and disable the sponsored stuff in the new tab page. Infinitely better than any other mainstream browser

          • original_ish_name@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Duckduckgo proxies bing search results (ober the api, they aren’t chad scrapers) and is therefore is under the foot of microsoft. This has forced them to whitelist ms trackers in their privacy tools but I haven’t heard anything bad about the search engine.

            Startpage scrapes google results so isn’t under anyones foot. It has had some controversy due to being bought by an ad company but they haven’t seemed to do anything bad yet

            In all, startpage is better than duckduckgo

            • RIP_Apollo@feddit.ch
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Are you referring to the time when the DuckDuckGo browser was blocking all known trackers except Microsoft trackers? After that information was made public and users complained, DuckDuckGo was able to renegotiate its agreement with Microsoft so that it can block their trackers.

              Furthermore, DuckDuckGo now publish their blocklist on GitHub.

              Source: https://techcrunch.com/2022/08/05/duckduckgo-microsoft-tracking-scripts

              It’s worth clarifying that this issue affected the DuckDuckGo browser, not the search engine itself.

              So if you were refusing to use DuckDuckGo browser on the basis that they allow Microsoft tracking, then that issue has been resolved now. But if you were saying that this incident has made you lose trust in DDG and that’s why you refuse to use it… well, that’s fair enough. It’s your choice, but I personally would trust DDG more than StartPage, just because StartPage is owned by an ad company.

        • HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It keeps Google from anti-competitive lawsuits. So it’s mutually beneficial, although the first thing you should do is change your search engine to a more private one.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Googles been the default engine since the Netscape Websuite days. I don’t always love what Mozilla does with their browser, but they do an excellent job of balancing “the web should be easy to use,” “the web should be humane,” and “the web should be what you want it to be.”

        If you want to say Mozilla sucks, that’s fine, go ahead, just be ready for that any other browser Dev group is either worse or dependent on being downstream of Firefox to do what they do

  • halvar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s neat especially next to the new thunderbird logo. IMHO it still has character and is not oversimplified.

  • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The old logo is too busy and doesn’t look like fire. Ngl I like the new one, it feels like the fire is cradling the earth.

  • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “What happened to me? People care more about polished functionality than their privacy, and are willing to trade privacy for something that steals all their data as long as it is “faster,” even though I’m arguably faster than Chrome at this point…”

    Most regular ass people don’t give one flying fuck about being owned by corporations, they’re happy to get reamed by companies that don’t give a shit if they live or die.

  • igorlogius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Side by side the old logo looks nicer … but i guess the simplified logo fits better into most desktop enviroments (out of the box), maybe since most other apps now also seem to use such designs.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sure quite a few people can agree that we do not like the oversimplifying of logos. I know I sure as hell don’t. The old logo was so much better looking if you ask me.

    • Swarfega@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didn’t it used to be called Firebird or something but had to change its name due to copyright? I remember when it was v1 and seeing advertising about it in the paper. It really did start the ball rolling in getting people away from IE. Chrome then came out and dominated.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I remember installing Firebird 0.6 off a magazine cover disk!

        I think I switched back to Mozilla pretty quickly as I was like “but this is just a browser, where’s email and IRC”

        I guess I didn’t originally get the point. Ended up switching back a couple of years later

    • limerod@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m fine with the current logo. But, the 2002 logo looks rad. After that, the logo from 2004 is cool.