• sorta_severine@lemmy.4d2.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Covering sucks. Nursing is hot before you have to put a sweaty blanket on, babies want to make eye contact while they’re nursing because it’s about connection and not just nourishment and in my experience, once they’re old enough to grab the cover, they’ll just throw it off their face and expose your titty anyway.

    As it turns out, having my tits out publicly didn’t lead to complete societal collapse, no matter how much I hoped it would.

    • dystop@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not to mention it’s another piece of fabric for the baby to get milk, spit and potentially vomit on…

  • chuso@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Spanish translation doesn’t make sense, seems to be made using the worst automated translator.

      • Hypersapien@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re going to use Google Translate, take the text it gives you and feed it back in to see if it translates back into English correctly.

      • stonesimulator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Google did some creative rewriting and killed half the joke. It actually says something like: “If you need mom[,] feed yourself you must. Covering! Thank you!”

        The original spanglish also has a spelling and grammar mistake: cubieta -> ‘cubierta’ (fem. part. form of “cubrirse”) which doesn’t fit at all here.

    • dystop@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is an old picture, so I’m assuming it was made when translations weren’t fantastic yet.

  • zombuey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who are these people who simultaneously care about titties and also want to see less of them?

          • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            If that’s how you perceive the comment then you have your own problems to deal with. Peace ✌️

              • torafugu@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                He’s jealous that the baby gets to suck on a titty. I don’t understand why some people have that fetish.

              • undermine@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I thought it was funny, I saw it as: big boobs equals much milk. I normally don’t like to shame people for their sense of humor. Of course, there are some exceptions.

    • dystop@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So I got a few reports based on this.

      In the interest of transparency - I’m leaving this up for now because it’s not illegal:

      • Sexualising the baby would be considered rule-breaking and the comment removed, but that isn’t the case here
      • Sexualising the act of breastfeeding (which some people think this comment does - but it’s not unanimous) is perhaps in poor taste, but not illegal in itself.
      • Expressing a preference for, uh, certain physical traits is fine, although that may again be viewed as creepy by some people.

      My verdict here is that this is not illegal. Regardless, the downvotes here should be a signal that some people find this distasteful.