• khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      In fairness the setup was absolutely beautiful. She’s some woman for the zingers.

      • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well, the setup worked for whichever side chimed in. Elon never stood a chance. The fact that she was describing multiple people is truely terrifying. But I guess that’s her point.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      She was definitely talking about Elongated, but probably had that comeback planned ahead of time.

    • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Elon is not a narcissist, he’s an asshole. Narcissists are innocent victims of abuse. You’re a bigot who hates disabled people.

      • voidMainVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Victims of abuse? Possibly. Innocent? No.

        Just because you’re the victim of abuse, that doesn’t give you the right to abuse others, and you aren’t “innocent” if you do so.

        • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I never abused anyone and neither did most people with NPD, because there is no link between having NPD and abusing others. You just invented an imaginary association between pwNPD and abusers because you hate disabled people.

  • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s honestly really gross that he immediately jumps to thinking she’s hitting on him. Like, him freaking out and going into a fit of rage might have been a less terrible response.

  • jtk@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Is there a place to verify these posts are real without actually touching Twitter (currently known as Elon Musk’s X)? I see there’s blue checkmarks on them but I have a feeling a really cleaver hacker could fake those in an image.

  • mateomaui@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Making it funnier is that this was from Apr 2022, when Elon didn’t even control Twitter yet, so her comment couldn’t actually apply to him. His offer had been accepted 4 days prior, but he would soon try to back out of it until Oct 2022.

    So those saying in the comments here that she was lying in her reply have some crow to eat.

  • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Does Zuck hang out with Tucker & Thiel also? It wouldn’t surprise me, but I hadn’t heard about it…not to the extent that Elon does, anyway.

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I assume anyone in silicon valley with two commas has hung out with Thiel at some point. He was one of the earliest investors in FB

  • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I wish he would step away from twitter and focus more on improving rockets and electric cars. Twitter seems like a big distraction.

    • Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I wish he would step away from twitter and focus more on improving rockets and electric cars

      He does none of those things. He uses his apartheid money to make others do the hard work and then he steals all the credit.

  • nobloat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    But why are they still supporting platforms run by billionaires? It’s so easy to talk, theorize and posture as this revolutionary figure. But when it comes down to giving up one single convenience, people freak out. I don’t know if I can take these people seriously.

      • nobloat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        What kind of value does Twitter actually bring to a politician? I think we tend to overestimate how much Twitter does influence politics of any kind. People who will support a politician will support them and people who don’t will not, Twitter will rarely sway anyone to a different position. Is it necessary to keep posting about every opinion you have constantly? If that’s what being politically active is, then politics has devolved beyond repair.

        • criitz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          People who will support a politician will support them and people who don’t will not, Twitter will rarely sway anyone to a different position.

          I disagree with this. It’s like when people say “why does Coca-Cola run ads, everyone knows them”. Marketing matters. Awareness matters. Maybe it shouldn’t but that’s how it be.

          • nobloat@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I agree to an extent. I understand your analogy but I think there’s a crucial difference between ads for a product and political positions. You can easily get someone to buy a product, but getting someone to change their views on, say, abortion is much harder. Political positions are tied to identities in ways that purchasing decisions are generally not. There may be some ways to sway some people who are on the fense about a given candidate or position, but I generally think this ability to change people is way overstated. People just keep posting their opinions over and over and think it’s actually changing someone’s mind, more often they are preaching to people who already agree with them.

        • HornyOnMain@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Simple. Direct, uncensored, and provocative announcements directly to your constituents without needing to set up an event for each topic you want to discuss. More eyes and more control of your message. The most important thing is the number of eyes you have on your content. The more people that know and talk about it, the more likely the people who can vote for you will know about you.

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t know why people love her so much, all she does is perpetuate this shitty style of politics. Why can’t they talk like grown-ups?

    • aew360@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I wouldn’t consider myself a progressive but AOC is the best among her peers when it comes to messaging with younger Americans. Perhaps this is the future of politics. Maybe it’s just a phase. Regardless, she’s good at it

      • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        AOC voted to force an end to the rail union strike. She’s just another neoliberal saying how do you do fellow kids.

        • aew360@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Uhhh no. Let’s be real, you’re looking at this with the same level of clarity that MAGA losers look at things. They think liberals are communists. You think democratic socialists are neoliberals. Just because someone doesn’t adhere to an ideology 100% of the time doesn’t make them not what they really are. We don’t have the same intel they have when they make their decisions. All we know is that after the votes are tallied, we can take a look at their voting records and plot them all on a chart. She is by no means in the same quadrant as moderate democratic and the remaining, near extinct moderate republicans who are firmly in the neoliberal one.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      For what it’s worth, she’s pretty good at cutting through the noise and explaining issues in an accessible way. There ARE moments like this but she seems to do good for her constituents. I don’t live in the area and I don’t know that much about her, but that’s the feeling I got