The 19-year veteran teacher was let go based on social media posts on her personal account from a drag performance at Houston’s Hamburger Mary’s.

  • Blamemeta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Taught at “First Baptist Academy”

    Went to a gay bay to see a drag performance and posted it on social media.

    Wtf did she expect? Best case scenario, they don’t notice.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m guessing Texas is an at-will state, but just going to a show of any kind in your private time should not be a firing offense no matter where you work. I don’t care if you work for the Southern Poverty Law Center and go see a minstrel show on Saturday. You’re doing it on your private time.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Religious institutions have a little more freedom in certain areas regarding who they can hire and fire depending on their job duties.

        For instance, a preacher for a Baptist church can be required to be Christian as a condition of their employment. But they can’t fire a janitor for religious reasons because their faith has no impact on the work they perform.

        For teachers, they probably have a policy regarding public support of the church and its doctrines that was violated when the teacher posted about attending a drag show.

        It’s stupid, but it’s legal.

        I have similar restrictions at my job in municipal government. I’m not allowed to get involved in local politics or advocate for or against candidates openly. As a public official, I’m always at least somewhat on duty.

        Hell, I have to be careful about what I text, because my personal phone is subject to Open Records requests.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s much simpler than that. Texas has been an at-will employment state since the 1800s. As long as it doesn’t violate civil rights, you can be fired for pretty much any reason in Texas. They can fire you because they don’t like your face.

          • Clocksstriking13@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            As long as the thing they don’t like about your face isn’t it’s color. But seriously American employment laws (in most states) allow for companies to fire people for any non-protected reason (protected reason = gender, race, age, etc). If a co.pany does illegally fire a person it can be a real up hill battle to prove it because at-will is so permissive.

            I can’t say a firing like this one sits super well with me personally but it’s almost certainly legal.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Absolutely, but for religious institutions they can even ignore civil rights in some instances. You can be fired for religious reasons, which is usually a big no-no.

            And at-will isn’t just a Texas thing. All 50 states and DC are at-will employment.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah but in your position it kinda makes sense. I don’t think career civil servants should be out there with even the hint of their office support endorsing candidates.

          Kinda interesting however that you are following strong ethical rules than all these powerful people above you.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Most civil employees stick hard and fast to their rules regarding politicization with a giant exception for police who get away with (sometimes literal) murder.

            Politicians are expressly political. The difference is that politicians can be voted out of office by the public. I cannot be directly voted away. Even City Council or the mayor cannot directly fire me - the only staff members they have direct hire/fire authority over are the City Manager and the Municipal Judge.

    • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seriously, though, are people still pretending Christian organizations are filled with decent human beings? You can just point to the majority of western history as an example of the kind of people running these orgs.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      What did she expect? She expected to see a great show. Do you go through life worrying about Big Brother watching over your shoulder?

    • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If its not on LinkedIn, who gives a flying fuck. Why are some people not allowed to share their personal lives on their personal social media pages?

      • XTL@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it does, if readers think that this kind of thing isn’t still happening in some places.

        • steltek@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          In Carson v. Makin, our lovely SCOTUS ruled that Maine should be forced to fund religious schools.