cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/7643915

As always in capitalism, video games have largely deformed from an art form into just another means to generate profit for large corporations

    • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
      9·
      1 year ago

      Politics is a branch of philosophy about how societies should be governed. If you want to make a social commentary that is non political, you would have to avoid mentioning how society is or should be run. Also, how people should organise together.

  • pingveno@lemmy.ml
    101·
    1 year ago

    Where I would love to see micro-transactions be a thing is news articles, videos, and other creative works. I’m happy to pay for someone’s work, especially if I’m not paying a bunch of overhead to some shitting credit card company. At the same time, I have no wish to pay for a $20 monthly subscription for the local newspaper in Middleofnowhere, Montana just so I can read one article.

  • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
    135·
    1 year ago

    Whoa whoa whoa, are you posting a meme that’s tangentially political to the Marxist Leninist meme community?

    I’m a capitalist shill and this offends me because it challenges my worldview and I don’t like that.

    • explodicle@local106.comEnglish
      61·
      1 year ago

      Clearly this should go on some other community with no subscribers. That way your message is neatly filed away somewhere nobody else will see it, especially me. I’m just in favor of proper sorting, that’s all! /s

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      32·
      1 year ago

      This is outrageous.

      It’s not like there’s a perfectly functional meme community at Lemmy.world that is suitable for properly sucking off the “job creators”

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    71·
    1 year ago

    I think a lot of Eastern European socialist states had ton of bribes (or sometimes “gifts”) to get anything done, including in some places “gifts” to your doctor.

    Unfortunately Marx didn’t eliminate all the micro transactions

    • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
      5·
      1 year ago

      Or you had a friend who worked at the store or the factory and could get you stuff because they liked you. A hundred friends could get you further than a hundred roubles.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        3·
        1 year ago

        I’ve heard that too. Connections being everything. I think those “you help me I help you” is sorta like micro transactions too.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        3·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know what’s their situation with corruption/bribery.

        Are you asking rhetorically meaning they don’t or seriously asking? Because if you are asking I could try to look it up but don’t know offhand.

    • Grammaton Cleric@lemmy.world
      21·
      1 year ago

      I really tried to like it for years. Bought it on suggestion from a friend. Couldn’t enjoy a game that has a timer constantly dictating what I do and how I do it, had the same problem with Bully. Great game, if I was given free reign of my own actions instead of a time-limited version.

      Also, I’m getting a bit tired of pixel graphics, been looking at them for the better part of 30 years. Time to move on.

  • Blackmist@feddit.ukEnglish
    27·
    1 year ago

    Everyone gets a lootbox.

    The lootbox contains one poor quality item.

    You get it two years after launch.

  • freijon@feddit.ch
    510·
    1 year ago

    The thing is: If everyone hated it, it would not work. But sadly it DOES work.

    • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tubeEnglish
      111·
      1 year ago

      Lootboxes are legalized gambling for minors. So yeah, no shit it works. Just because a thing is profitable doesn’t make it good. The opioid epidemic proved very profitable, but just like gambling for kids, doesn’t make it a thing we should accept or want for our society.

    • this@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      4·
      1 year ago

      Well, theres “working” and theres “working well”. Capitalism is not working so well anymore and its likely going to work worse as time goes on. more things will become automated, wealth inequality (and therefore a gap in political power) will grow, and companies will keep expecting increased growth in a world of limited(and in some cases, decreasing) resources. Capitalism currently “works” in the sense that its making resources move around, but thats about all its doing for regular, non rich, non well off people(and often is not doing even that much for them). It’s simply not sustainable when unregulated, thats why we need a well regulated economy.

  • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    1242·
    1 year ago

    Bollocks, any decent game needs a fuck ton of capital to develop

    Please share all the greatest communist games

    Agree that loot boxes suck, they are gambling, not gaming

    Edit. Yes, Tetris. One game made in 1985. Brilliant example Tankards.

    So the score so far for games made:

    Communism - 1

    Capitalism - 831,000

        • crypticthree@lemmy.world
          102·
          1 year ago

          Yeah it being an incredibly addictive universally approachable game has nothing to do with it being widely played for over 40 years… 🙄

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            3·
            1 year ago

            Psst. Almost 40 years. Tetris was released in 1985 not 1983

            This comment brought to you by an old fuck that doesn’t need to be artificially aged to be even older

            • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
              8·
              1 year ago

              Would be kind of hard to play a game that didn’t get published by the evil capitalist lol

              I’ve played about a dozen versions of Tetris over the last 30 years, a lot of which were written by just one dude and released to the world without the expectation of compensation. There are literally hundreds of ports/clones that run on everything from a Nokia phone to a Unix/Linux text mode interface.

              Were it not for western publishers, I’m pretty sure it would have spread anyway just due to its addictive nature and it being an excellent time sink. Just like chess and checkers didn’t need a capitalist to spread around the globe.

              I’m literally using an entire operating system right now that not one capitalist controls. It runs most of the internet’s infrastructure. Sure, the capitalists can use it and even contribute, but they don’t get to dictate how you run your system.

                • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
                  3·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh, funny you mention that, because in my country, my government paid to have fiber laid but the useless bloodsucking capitalist ISPs didn’t do absolutely jack shit with the money and pocketed it. That’s why were having to do stupid shit like Starlink now to connect the people out in the sticks.

                  My electricity is also provided by a co-op.

                • RoosterBoy@lemm.ee
                  31·
                  1 year ago

                  1. You moved the goalposts

                  2. How did the soviets make Tetris if technology only exists under capitalism?

            • Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
              6·
              1 year ago

              No it wouldn’t. Tetris was going to get played by millions whether someone licensed it or not. That’s why there was such a mad scramble to land a deal.

        • MxM111@kbin.social
          71·
          1 year ago

          That’s only because in the West there was no way for the game to reach customers at the time. The game was popular in the “Soviet Block” just fine, because distribution model was different.

          Today, it would spread through internet like fire.

          • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            28·
            1 year ago

            Sure, I’m always playing Vietnamese and Cuban games. They’re grrrreat!

            And Tetris was only successful because of licencing, let’s not create an alternative history here

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      212·
      1 year ago

      Minecraft

      Terraria

      Astrox Imperium (this is a single player version of EvE Online, so definitely not for everyone)

      Dyson Sphere Program

      Factorio

      UFO:AI (admittedly this is a FOSS XCOM game that started as a clone of XCOM Apocalypse, and morphed into something bigger)

      All developed by either a single person, or tiny teams with basically no start up capital. I’m sure I can find more, since the FOSS list of games is enormous.

      Labor develops society. Capital enshittifies society.

    • Wakmrow@lemmy.world
      151·
      1 year ago

      Capital doesn’t cease to exist under communism, guy. It just stops being controlled by one person.

    • алсааас [she/they]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPEnglish
      163·
      1 year ago

      A few (good and one time buy) games off the top of my head (is that how you use the expression/idiom?):

      Obviously commie games:

      • Disco Elysium
      • Cruelty Squad

      Might or might not be commie, but definitely progressive:

      • Bioshock series

      honourable mentions:

      • Vitoria 3 (who would have thought that a democratically controlled and publicly owned economy would be meta? does have a nasty dlc policy tho)
      • Partisans 1941 (you play the story of soviet partisans on the eastern front, what more is there to say?)
      • everything from the studio “Kremlingames” (they make political sims about eastern block countries, without glorifying them)
      • Workers & Resources: Soviet Republic (eastern block “City: Skylines”)
      • VA-11 Hall-A (good vn in a cyberpunk dystopia, does not rly have a political theme tho iirc)
    • culprit@lemmy.ml
      81·
      1 year ago

      Capital is dead labor, which, vampire-like, lives only by sucking living labor, and lives the more, the more labor it sucks

    • macniel@feddit.de
      42·
      1 year ago

      Sure but does it need that money when it’s released or is it simply there because of publisher greed?